The air in Boulder, Colorado, hangs heavy, not just with the summer heat, but with a chilling narrative. It’s a story whispered in the cafes of Pearl Street, a shadow lengthening from the events of June 1st, 2025 – a terror attack that continues to unravel, to mutate, and to ignite a furious debate. But what truly matters is not the specifics of the attack itself, nor the immediate aftermath. It’s the unsettling pattern, the unsettling questions it forces us to confront.

The initial reports, fragmented and often contradictory, painted a horrific picture: a lone figure, identified as Mohamad Soliman, wielding a makeshift flamethrower, setting fire to a crowd of peaceful marchers advocating for hostages held in Gaza. Victims, including children, burned, the air thick with the acrid smell of gasoline and denial. But this wasn’t simply an act of senseless violence; it was framed – meticulously, deliberately – as a symptom of a deeper disease.

Social media has become a battleground. Accusations fly, fueled by partisan fervor and speculation. The initial outrage focused on the perceived “left-wing” nature of the marchers, decrying them as supporters of a “globalized intifada.” Conspiracy theories blossomed, fuelled by the fact that Soliman had obtained a visa during the Trump administration, and the insistence that the attack highlighted, once more, the alleged failings of the Biden administration. We need to examine the timing and the accusations—did the attack truly emerge as the consequence of a policy, or was the narrative about this has become about it has become about has become about this has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about has become about This is a terrible pattern of hate began with the first shots of hatred began with the first shots of hatred begun with has begun with began with has begun with has been filled with filled with began with with begun with has begun with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has began with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with began with has begun with has begun with began with has begun with begun with has begun with.

And now a critical question continues to continue and this is a

Find out more…